Saturday, April 29, 2017

Treasure (£100 million) Island: "The World's Biggest Booty Haul"

That's '...biggest booty haul', not "world's biggest booty....", for which see Google, at your own risk or Kardashian, Kim or Tim "Booty" Wilson, below (again, at your own risk).

Re: the hood, if you are going to be wandering around looking for treasure this is as nice a place as any.

From the BBC:

The Island With £100 Million Hidden
According to legend, pirate treasure reportedly worth £100 million is buried on an Indian Ocean island. This is the true story of two men’s life-long search.
According to legend, pirate treasure reportedly worth £100 million is buried on an Indian Ocean island.

Although the region is thought to be littered with hidden treasure, this one is said to be the Holy Grail, the world’s biggest booty haul. The story, which reads like a Hollywood script, has been passed down through generations on the islands of the Seychelles and La Réunion.
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeatures/wm/live/1600_900/images/live/p0/51/3d/p0513dzp.jpg
Although many have tried – and failed – to locate the bounty, two men have devoted their lives to the quest. Reginald Herbert Cruise-Wilkins, known locally on the Seychelles island of Mahé as the ‘Treasure Man’, hunted the fortune for 27 years until his death in 1977. His son John inherited both the nickname and the quest.

When I first met John, he immediately barked that I was half an hour late. I didn’t expect a warm welcome; John is constantly hounded by writers and locals who stop him wherever he is, asking if he is looking for buried treasure.

But as he showed me around what he believes is the treasure site, and talked about the clues and what he had left to do, the gruff man melted into one you couldn’t help but root for. His eyes twinkled and his smile was infectious. Even after all these years of searching, he was still the storybook boy hero armed with his backpack and treasure map, trying to piece together the puzzle. His is a story of hope and of never giving up, despite the odds.

John explained that the fascinating tale of the treasure started in 1716 when Frenchman Olivier Levasseur, otherwise known as ‘La Buse’ (The Buzzard) because of the speed with which he would attack his enemies, was given a letter of marque to operate as a privateer. But within a few months, Levasseur turned to the more lucrative career of pirating.

In 1721, Levasseur and his associates – then with 750 pirates over three ships – came across a Portuguese galleon flying British colours, Nossa Senhora do Cabo, in the port of La Réunion, then called Bourbon Island. They landed 250 men on board and killed the crew. Levasseur, who had no idea what was on the ship, was astonished with the haul. According to John, a historian described it as ‘a floating treasure house, believed to consist of gold and silver bars, precious stones, uncut diamonds, guineas, church plate and goblets.’...MUCH MORE

Apparently Balenciaga Made A $2100 Knockoff of the IKEA Tote Bag, IKEA Is Amused

And IKEA decided to mock the fashion house for doing so.
From domino, April 26:

IKEA Hilariously Responds to Balenciaga's Copycat Tote
Balenciaga offers a $2150 tote that looks nearly identical to IKEA's signature shopper.

https://img.domino.com/serve/ikea-hilariously-responds-to-balenciaga-s-copycat-tote-5900a1bc95f10c2057dc1993-w1000_h1000.jpg
Anyone who's shopped at IKEA is familiar with the retailer's signature tote - the Frakta. Generously oversized and sensibly priced, the iconic blue bags are known for their versatility and (for better or for worse) their capability to hold even the most impressive hauls. Needless to say, the shopping bag has essentially become synonymous with the brand, boasting the classic bright blue hue with pops of yellow. 
Last week, luxe fashion brand Balenciaga rolled out a new tote that bore an uncanny resemblance to the Swedish retailer's own. The difference? It would come to set you back an extra $2,149.01, thanks to its "blue wrinkled, glazed leather" composition and Balenciaga label. IKEA's response to the replica came in the form of a cheeky ad, from Swedish agency ACNE, helping shoppers correctly identify an original Frakta tote:
https://img.domino.com/serve/ikea-hilariously-responds-to-balenciaga-s-copycat-tote-59009f46014a5e20454de197-w1000_h1000.jpg

New York Fed: The Information Value of Commodity Prices

From the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Liberty Street Economics blog, March 21, 2016:

What Tracks Commodity Prices?
LSE_2016_growth-commodities_klikgaard_460_art
Various news reports have asserted that the slowdown in China was a key factor driving down commodity prices in 2015. It is true that China’s growth eased last year and, owing to its manufacturing-intensive economy, that slackening could reasonably have had repercussions for commodity prices. Still, growth in Japan and Europe accelerated in 2015, with the net result that global growth was fairly steady last year, casting doubt on the China slowdown explanation. An alternative story relies on the strong correlation between the dollar and commodity prices over time. A simple regression shows that both global growth and the dollar track commodity prices, and in this framework, it is the rise of the dollar that captures last year’s drop in commodity prices. Thus a forecast of stable global growth and a relatively unchanged dollar suggests little change in commodity prices in 2016. 

Prices Are Correlated with Global Growth
Commodity prices tend to fall when the global economy falters and rise when it is booming. The chart below compares global growth, as measured by the International Monetary Fund, with the annual percentage change in the Commodity Research Bureau price index for raw industrial goods (various metals, cotton, rubber, wool, and other goods). The two lines move together, with a regression using global growth having an R-squared of .52. That is, global growth explains around 50 percent of change in this commodity price index over this period. Looking at the chart, the closest co-movements are from 2004 to 2007—when the world economy was growing at an annual pace of more than 5 percent and the commodity price index was rising 15 percent per year—the collapse in growth in 2008-09, and the rebound in 2010-11. However, this relationship struggles to explain the 1995-96 and 2012-15 periods, with the latter being one of stable global growth and steep commodity price declines in both 2012 and 2015. 
http://libertystreeteconomics.typepad.com/.a/6a01348793456c970c01bb08c9bef1970d-pi
The stability of global growth does not necessarily preclude China’s flagging growth from having a significant role in the decline of commodity prices last year. In particular, China is more commodity-intensive than Japan and Europe and this shift in composition of growth last year is hidden in the global growth variable. Breaking down global growth into emerging and advanced countries reveals that the volatility of commodity prices is better captured by the growth of emerging economies than the growth of advanced economies. Some of this may be due to commodity prices affecting the economies of commodity-producing countries. Still, growth in emerging economies only slowed by half of a percentage point in 2015, so this variable is not enough to explain last year’s steep decline. Also, note that a regression using global growth does a better job tracking commodity prices than one that relies only on the growth of emerging economies.

Prices Are Also Correlated with the Dollar
Analysts looking for another explanation of last year’s price decline point to the strong correlation of commodity prices with the dollar—commodity prices tend to fall (rise) when the dollar appreciates (depreciates). One theory is that prices fall when the dollar strengthens because commodities priced in dollars become more expensive to the rest of the world, thereby restraining demand. It is a plausible explanation, but it is also quite possible that the dollar is not a causal factor and is instead correlated with other underlying factors affecting commodity prices.

The next chart shows these two data series with the dollar index of major currencies inverted so that the relationship is easier to see....MUCH MORE

CoreLogic Sees Signs of Credit Cracks

From Mortgage News Daily:
Apr 28 2017, 9:24AM
Here we go again?

Sam Khater, CoreLogic's deputy chief economist, says loan performance is beginning to show some cracks in what has been a near perfect veneer.  This might be an early signal of a downturn in the credit cycle.  Khater is not issuing a warning, merely alerting those who should be watching such things to pay attention.

He writes, in an article in the CoreLogic Insights blog, that a typical economic expansion and recession are strongly driven by loan performance.  When times are good, lenders take on more marginal borrowers then tend to become more conservative when loan performance begins to deteriorate.  That often exacerbates an economic downturn.
 http://f.mortgagenewsdaily.com/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/jann/0000201704/2017-4-28+cl1.png?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAITGSRAFQQZDCPGHQ&Expires=1493491585&Signature=7xho0v%2f8NEAVTh70spUksl6dSFg%3d
Loan performance across the four major types of loans (agricultural, business, personal consumption, and real estate) all improved throughout the first five years of the expansion.  Then, over the last year, performance of the first three loan types began to slip.  Real estate loans bucked the trend, continuing to improve.  Now, Khater says, there are small signs that their pristine levels of performance could be deteriorating.

Mortgage performance is typical measured by levels of delinquency and foreclosure but those, Khater says, are both backward looking and lag as indicators.  One way to address that is through transition rate analysis.  This method controls for time by looking, in the case of his analysis, at loan vintage, i.e. production within a given year, which he says, allows for a much more nuanced view of performance.

By focusing on only those loans produced in the first 10 months of each year in question allowed Khater to include 2016 data in his analysis.  His justification for the short and early time frame is that historically the first six to nine months of a loan's performance have a very strong persistence, and loans tend to remain on a similar track years later.  He starts his analysis with 2010 as the first full year of the expansion vintages and says underwriting has remained roughly similar since then....MORE

Ida M. Tarbell: "John D. Rockefeller: A Character Study"

A repost from six years ago. The language is evergreen.

Ida M. Tarbell: "John D. Rockefeller: A Character Study"

She was one of the original Muckrakers in McClure's Magazine's January 1901 issue.
This piece is a bit later, McClure's July 1905 via the Tarbell Collection at Allegheny College.

Author of "The History of the Standard Oil Company," "Life of Lincoln," ETC.
Illustrated with Portraits
Part One.
"A prince should earnestly endeavor to gain the reputation of kindness, clemency, piety, justice, and fidelity to his engagements. He ought to possess all these good qualities BUT STILL RETAIN SUCH POWER OVER HIMSELF AS TO DISPLAY THEIR OPPOSITES WHENEVER IT MAY BE EXPEDIENT. . . He should make it a rule, above all things, never to utter anything which does not breathe of kindness, justice, good faith, and piety; this last quality it is most important for him to appear to possess as men in general judge more from appearances than from reality. All men have eyes but few have the gift of penetration. Every one sees your exterior, but few can discern what you have in your heart." — Machiavelli — The Prince. Chap. xviii. "
John D. Rockefeller is without question the most conspicuous type of our present dominating commercial man. "The most important man in the world" a great and serious newspaper passionately devoted to democracy calls him, and unquestionably this is the popular measure of him. His importance lies not so much in the fact that he is the richest individual in the world, with the control of property which that entails; it lies in the fact that his wealth, and the power springing from it, appeal to the most universal and powerful passion in this country — the passion for money. John D. Rockefeller, measured by our national ambition, is the most successful man in the world — the man who has got the most of what men most want. How did he get it, the eager youth asks, and asking, strives to imitate him as nearly as ability and patience permit. Thus he has become an inspirer of American ideals, and his methods have been crystallized into a great national commercial code.

Nor is this all. Mr. Rockefeller distributes money in charity and in endowments. If not our first, he is certainly our second philanthropist; the amount of the money given being the standard. All over the land those who direct great educational, charitable and religious institutions are asking, "Can we not get something from him?" Receiving his bequests they become at least the tacit supporters of the thing for which he stands — that is, John D. Rockefeller exercises a powerful control over the very sources of American intellectual and religious inspiration.

Now a man who possesses this kind of influence cannot be allowed to live in the dark. The public not only has the right to know what sort of a man he is; it is the duty of the public to know. How else can the public discharge the most solemn obligation it owes to itself and to the future, to keep the springs of its higher life clean? Who then is this John D. Rockefeller? Whence did he come? By what qualities did he grow to such power? Has he proved his right to the power? Does he give to the public whence he has drawn his wealth a just return in ideas, in patriotism, in devotion to social betterment, in generous living, in inspiring personal character? Has John D. Rockefeller made good? From time immemorial men who have risen to power have had to face this question. Kings, tyrants, chieftains, since the world began have stood or have fallen as they have convinced the public that they were giving or not giving a just return for the power allowed them. The time is here when Mr. Rockefeller must face the verdict of the public by which he lives.

As to Mr. Rockefeller's origin it is typically American. He sprang from one of those migrating families which, coming to this country in the seventeenth century, has moved westward with each generation seeking a betterment of condition. He and his brothers were the first great product of a restless family searching a firm footing on new soil. The first word heard of the Rockefeller family in Richford, Tioga County, New York, where John D. Rockefeller was born, was in the early 1830's when his grandfather, Godfrey Rockefeller, moved to that community from Mud Creek, Massachusetts. There are still alive in Tioga County many men and women who remember Godfrey Rockefeller. It is not a pleasant description they give of him — a shiftless tippler, stunted in stature and mean in spirit, but held to a certain decency by a wife of such strong intellect and determined character that she impressed herself unforgettably on the community.

Godfrey Rockefeller had not been long in Richford when he was followed by his eldest son — William A. Rockefeller — a man of twenty-three or twenty-four years of age. There seem to have been other Rockefellers, for the family was sufficiently numerous and conspicuous to cause the farm in West Hill near Richford, where they settled, to be dubbed "Rockefeller settlement" — a name it still bears.

It is with William A. Rockefeller, father of John, that we have to do here. There is enough which is authentic to be gleaned about him to form a picture of a striking character. William A. Rockefeller was a tall and powerful man with keen straightforward eyes, a man in whom strength, and fearlessness, and joy in life, unfettered by education or love of decency, ran riot. The type is familiar enough in every farming settlement, the type of the country sport, who hunts, fishes, gambles, races horses and carouses in the low and mean ways which the country alone affords. He owned a costly rifle, and was famous as a shot. He was a dare-devil with horses. He had no trade — spurned the farm. Indeed he had all the vices save one — he never drank. He was a famous trickster, too; thus, when he first reached Richford he is said to have called himself a peddler — a deaf and dumb peddler, and for some time he actually succeeded in making his acquaintances in Richford write out their remarks to him on a slate. Why he wished to deceive them no one knows. Perhaps sheer mischief, perhaps a desire to hear things which would hardly be talked before a stranger with good ears.

It was not long after he came to Richford that he began to go off on long trips — peddling trips some said. Later he became known as a quack doctor, and his absences were supposed to be spent selling a medicine he concocted himself. Irregular and wild as his life undoubtedly was, his strength and skill and daring, his frankness, his careful dress, for he paid great attention to his clothes, as well as the mystery surrounding the occupation which kept him looking so prosperous, made him a favorite with the young and reckless and, unhappily, with women. On one of his trips he met in Moravia, New York, the daughter of a prosperous farmer, Eliza Davison. It is said that the girl married him in the face of strong opposition of her family. However that may be, it is certain that about 1837, William A. Rockefeller brought Eliza Davison to the Rockefeller settlement as his wife, and here three children were born, the second of whom — the record of his birth is dated July 8, 1839 — was named John Davison.

In 1843 William A Rockefeller moved his family to a farm near Moravia, Cayuga County. The reputation he had built up in Richford as a "sporting man" was duplicated in Moravia. He soon became the leader in all that was reckless and wild in the community, and was classed by the respectable and steady-going as a dangerous character on whom no doubt much was fastened that did not belong. It may be for this reason, as well as because of his frequent long and unaccounted for absences, that he is still classed popularly in Moravia as one of the gang who operated the "underground horse railroad" — and ran off horses from various parts of the country. There is absolutely no proof of this, but the conviction and sentence to the State prison, in 1850, of three of his closest pals for horse-stealing coupled with his bad reputation made many of his disapproving neighbors fix the crime equally on him, and to-day old men in Moravia nod their heads sagely and say, "He was too smart to be caught."

There is an indictment against William A. Rockefeller for a more serious crime (rape) than horse-stealing in the records of the County, for 1849, and it is quite probable that he left Moravia under compulsion. At all events, about 1850 he again moved his family, which now consisted of his wife and five children, to Owego, New York. The family remained in Owego but three years, and then moved to Strongsville, Ohio, twelve or fifteen miles southwest of Cleveland. A year later they left Strongsville for a country settlement, about seven miles south of Cleveland, called Parma; and from there they went, in 1857, to Cleveland, moving into a comfortable brick house, which William A. Rockefeller had built for them....MORE
Hat Tip that the piece was out there (from a different source): Longform.org:

As I mentioned in 2016's "Izabella Kaminska on Muckrakers, Monopolists and Miscreants": 

Over the years, simply because the blog is composed of things that caught my eye rather than some grand plan, we've from time to time mentioned some of the early 20th century journalists who got appended the term muck-rakers but when I did a quick search of the blog I was surprised how many we'd named, although usually just in passing.
Some links below.

Here, Ms. Kaminska writing for the paper rather than the flagship blog tips her cap to one of the most influential...

.... In 2011 we visited Ida Tarbell in "Ida M. Tarbell: 'John D. Rockefeller: A Character Study'" in part because I wanted a searchable link to the Tarbell collection at Allegheny college and partly because she described John D.'s grandfather, Godfrey as "a shiftless tippler, stunted in stature and mean in spirit".

In February 2016's "Oil Tankers and Interest Rates and Scallywags and Time" one of the Rockefeller minions, Thomas Lawson, got a mention, not for his exposé of his copper dealings with Standard Oil honcho Henry Huttleston Rogers, Frenzied Finance, but because of the ship for which Lawson was namesake.

Staying in 2016, it was Ida's buddy Lincoln Steffens in "Goldman Sachs: Death Of Capitalism Averted, Time For Working Schlubs to Partaay!", again not for the work he was most famous for, in Steffens' case his Shame of the Cities (St. Louis, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh et al) but because of his famously wrong statement about Soviet Russia in a letter dated April 3, 1919: “I have seen the future and it works.”.
It didn't.

In 2015 there was Jacob Riis because I was reminded of one of the photographs from "How the Other Half Lives: Studies among the Tenements of New York":
Jacob Riis Lives! "San Francisco Housing Bubble Goes Subterranean: $500/Month To Live In A Crawlspace"
 
And along the way Theodore Dreiser got a major link (possibly one of the best business novels ever) in "Switzerland Begins Two-Year Trial of Driverless Buses (plus money, art, glory and sex)"

So yes, more than wary reader might have anticipated and I've probably forgotten a couple.
Circling back to Ida, here's an online version of History of the Standard Oil Company.

Although there are quite a few critiques you can raise about her book it was pretty important and was one of the factors that led to the breakup of Standard Oil in the Supreme Court decision "Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States" seven years later. So Mr Rockefeller probably considered the book important.

It ranks #5 on NYU's Journalism school's list of the 100 best works of 20th-century American journalism. (via the NYT)

Friday, April 28, 2017

"Economists React to First Quarter GDP Report: ‘Stronger Than It Appears’"

Not that much stronger.

From the WSJ's Real Time Economics blog:
The U.S. economy grew at the slowest pace in three years during the first quarter, rising at a 0.7% rate, down from the prior quarter’s 2.1% rate. Here are early reactions from economists and analysts:

“Perhaps most encouraging, business investment in equipment, which had languished for two years, posted a 9.1% annualized advance (I had looked for a 6% rise). If the government can pull off corporate tax reform, I look for a torrent of investment projects to be unleashed. Until then, gains will be limited.” —Stephen Stanley, Amherst Pierpont Securities

Economy stronger than it appears in [first-quarter] report, already showing signs of accelerating again. Tailwind for wages encouraging.” —Diane Swonk, DS Economics

“While consumers may have stood still in the first quarter, sluggishness in consumer spending did not translate to the housing market…Housing is on track to cement its place as the bright spot on the economy.” —Nela Richardson, Redfin

“Growth of less than 1% means the wheels are up but the economy’s engines cannot gain any altitude. We will see how long the mile-high confidence readings of consumers and businesses hold up. The best temperature gauge of their relative optimism is always the stock market we always thought and Dow industrials closed up 6.2% year-to-date last night before the GDP data.” —Chris Rupkey, MUFG Union Bank

“Here’s why I’m not freaking out about the low preliminary estimate to U.S. GDP (spoiler: it’ll get revised)” —Tara Sinclair, Indeed

“The trivial 0.7% annualized gain in first-quarter GDP, below the consensus forecast at 1.2%, won’t necessarily stop the Fed from hiking interest rates again in June. In recent years there is a well-established pattern of GDP growth disappointing in the first quarter and then rallying over the remaining three quarters.” —Paul Ashworth, Capital Economics
...MORE

"As If Millions Of Unicorns Suddenly Cried Out In Terror": Cloudera IPOes At Less Than Half Its Last Private Valuation Round

From ZeroHedge:
It was a little over a year ago when the market first started noticing that the private startup market had gotten just a little ahead of itself, with various dotcom 2.0 darlings such as Dropbox, Square and others slashing their private valuations by substantial amounts. Well, overnight investors at peak private valuations got another harsh reminder of just how much they may have overpaid when  Cloudera, once one of the most highly valued private tech companies, priced its IPO at less than half the company's valuation from its last private financing round back in 2014.

As the FT notes, the share sale marked a new low for so-called unicorns, or private tech companies once valued at more than $1bn. Companies such as Cloudera have turned to Wall Street as the once red-hot private investment market has cooled, forcing some to take big discounts on their former valuations to raise more money.

Among the biggest losers in the Cloudera IPO, if only on paper, will be Intel, which sank $742m into the big data company in 2014. At the time, that investment set a record $4.1 billion valuation for Cloudera, pushing it into the top 30 ranking of most valuable global "unicorns" according to the WSJ. Fast forward to late on Thursday, when the company announced a price of $15 for shares in its IPO. While above the indicated range of $12-$14, it was less than half the $30.95 it sold its shares for in 2014.

Cloudera will raise $225 million in cash proceeds from its NYSE IPO on Friday, giving it an initial market cap of $1.9 billion.

While there have been various other tech companies that have suffered the "private valuation" hammer, forced to accept much lower valuations to maintain their access to capital in the public market, none has taken as big a cut.

“Nothing has happened quite like Cloudera — yet,” said Kashif Sheikh, an analyst at PrivCo, which tracks the financing of private companies. “People are coming to realise that these companies are not worth those last private rounds.”...MORE

Dear Mr. Kalanick, "China's Didi Raises Over $5.5 Billion in Record Tech Funding"

Didi's relentless approach is getting a bit scary but I do laugh when thinking of the company's President's thoughts on the biz:
I still can't get the picture of Didi Chuxing's President, Liu Qing (anglicized to Jean Liu), commenting on Travis Kalanick and Uber's efforts in China as cute. Then when Uber proclaimed the $3.5 billion investment from the Saudis she laughed and said she had more than that on the way. 
Didi then announced the completion of a $7.3 billion fundraising.
Uber better be on top of their game in Southeast Asia because they weren't in China and got run out of the country....
That's from last month's "Does Uber Go Bankrupt If Didi Chuxing Decides To Compete In the United States?".
From Bloomberg:
Ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing raised more than $5.5 billion from investors, scoring the largest round of funding ever for a technology company to bankroll an expansion beyond China and into driver-less technology.

Didi, which drove Uber Technologies Inc. out of China last year, is already one of the country’s best-funded private companies: its backers range from powerful state agencies to global venture firms and WeChat-operator Tencent Holdings Ltd. The latest financing, which Didi disclosed in an emailed statement Friday, may propel forays into everything from artificial intelligence to auto-financing -- and potentially markets beyond its home territory.

Didi, led by the 33-year-old Cheng Wei, didn’t reveal the backers who joined this round. People familiar with the matter said this week that the investors would include SoftBank Group Corp., Silver Lake Kraftwerk, China Merchants Bank Co. and an arm of Bank of Communications Co. The round was said to have raised the four-year-old startup’s valuation to about $50 billion, up from a previous $34 billion after its acquisition of Uber’s China business.

That price tag would surpass smartphone maker Xiaomi Corp.’s and make Didi the world’s most valuable startup after Uber. Didi amassed $10 billion in cash and equivalents last year, but the deal yields more ammunition as it prepares to challenge Uber and Alphabet Inc. in automated driving, and buys the company time to carve out new revenue streams.

Cheng founded Didi less than five years ago after leaving e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. He and former colleagues started the business with financing from one of Alibaba’s ex-executives and initially launched the service in the southern metropolis of Shenzhen.

As the business took off, he won out over rivals through competition or acquisition. That culminated with last year’s acquisition of Uber’s China business, resulting in the U.S. ride-hailing company getting a 17.5 percent stake in Didi....MORE
...Having cornered the market for on-demand cars and taxis, Cheng is branching out into bus services and bikes, throwing his weight for instance behind one of the country’s largest bicycle-renting services, Ofo. On the global front, the company has formed an alliance with Grab in Southeast Asia and Ola in India, to thwart Uber in those regions.... 

Previously:
Ridezilla: Chinese Rideshare Co, Didi Chuxing Is Looking to Raise Another $6 Billion
Uber Competitor Didi Chuxing Raises $7 Billion In Latest Round
Apple Investee Didi Chuxing Says It Is About To Raise More Cash Than Uber's $3.5 Billion Saudi Deal
"Uber is being mocked by its biggest competitor in China" 
Apple Investee Didi Chuxing Receives Another $600 Million, This Time From An Uber Backer
Uber fares in China soar after Didi deal
"Uber's Chinese Rival is Raising Another $1 Billion"
"Apple invests $1 billion in Chinese ride-hailing service Didi Chuxing" (AAPL)
When you have a couple hundred billion liquid, you have to do something with it.


Might as well buy your way into China.

And many more. Use the search blog box if interested. 

Natural Gas: EIA Weekly Supply/Demand Report

$3.2330 last off 0.0060.
From the Energy Information Administration:
...Prices/Supply/Demand:
...June Nymex contract flat. At the Nymex, the May 2017 contract expired yesterday at $3.142/MMBtu, down 4¢ from last Wednesday. The June 2017 contract remained unchanged Wednesday to Wednesday at $3.271/MMBtu. The price of the 12-month strip, which averages the June 2017 through May 2018 futures contracts, increased 1¢ to $3.370/MMBtu.

Supply flat. According to data from PointLogic, the average total supply of natural gas remained the same as the previous report week, averaging 74.8 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d). Dry natural gas production remained constant week over week. Average net imports from Canada decreased by 2% from last week.

Demand rises slightly. Total U.S. consumption of natural gas rose by 2% compared with the previous report week, according to data from PointLogic. Week over week, power burn declined by 2%, industrial sector consumption increased by 1%, and residential/commercial sector consumption increased by 12%. Natural gas exports to Mexico increased 24% as maintenance on the NET Mexico Pipeline concluded over the weekend, and export flows were restored on the line.

Because of maintenance on the NET Mexico pipeline, the United States made its first two shipments of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Mexico's Altamira import terminal in the Gulf of Mexico. Mexico has been the largest recipient of U.S. LNG exports, with 20 cargoes shipped since the start of LNG exports in February 2016, but all shipments prior to these two went to the Manzanillo terminal on Mexico's west coast.

U.S. LNG exports. Natural gas pipeline deliveries to the Sabine Pass liquefaction terminal averaged 1.1 Bcf/d for the report week, 43% lower than in the previous week. Three vessels (combined LNG-carrying capacity of 11.4 Bcf) departed Sabine Pass last week (Thursday to Wednesday).
Last week, the proposed Golden Pass LNG liquefaction terminal received an approval from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to export up to 2.21 Bcf/d of LNG to non-Free Trade Agreement (FTA) countries for 20 years. To date, DOE has authorized 19.2 Bcf/d of LNG exports to non-FTA countries.
more price data

Storage:
Mild temperatures result in higher-than-average net injections into working gas storage. Net injections into storage totaled 74 Bcf, compared with the five-year (2012–16) average net injection of 57 Bcf and last year's net injections of 64 Bcf during the same week. Net injections into working gas during the storage week were the largest reported so far in the 2017 injection season and the largest reported this early in the refill season since April 17, 2015.

Working gas levels are 14% lower than last year's record levels, but well ahead of the five-year average. Working gas levels are 358 Bcf lower than last year's levels at this time. This year-over-year deficit prevails in each of the regions of the Lower 48 states. The South Central region has the largest year-over-year deficit of 131 Bcf. The Midwest and Pacific regions are both 48 Bcf lower than last year's levels. In contrast, working gas levels are 299 Bcf higher than the five-year average in the Lower 48 states and are higher than the five-year average in all regions except the East and the Pacific regions, which are 53 Bcf and 15 Bcf lower than the five-year average, respectively. The South Central region accounts for 222 Bcf of the surplus compared with the five-year average, and the Midwest region is 117 Bcf higher than the five-year average.

The January futures price is trading at a premium over the current spot price, but well behind last year's level at this time. During the most recent storage week, the average natural gas spot price at the Henry Hub was $3.09/MMBtu, while the Nymex futures price of natural gas for delivery in January 2018 averaged $3.62/MMBtu, a difference of 54¢. The premium was $1.10 a year ago. The price premium provides incentives for continued injections of natural gas into storage....MUCH MORE

U.S. natural gas consumption - Gas Week: (4/20/17 - 4/26/17)

Average daily values (Bcf/d):

this week
last week
last year
U.S. consumption
55.9
54.7
58.9
    Power
22.6
23.1
25.7
    Industrial
20.5
20.2
20.3
    Residential/commercial
12.8
11.4
12.9
Mexico exports
3.6
2.9
3.5
Pipeline fuel use/losses
5.8
5.6
6.1
LNG pipeline receipts
1.9
2.1
0.5
Total demand
67.2
65.4
69.0

Thursday, April 27, 2017

How Maritime Insurance Built Ancient Rome

Yes, insurance, that's wot done it.

Pre-coffeehouse insurance mart

From Priceonomics, Mar. 18, 2016:
In Ancient Rome, shipping was a very big deal.
Sea voyages were a major economic activity—and a risky one. Ships sank, ran afoul of piracy, suffered delays due to weather, or arrived to find that prices were unexpectedly low. This made insuring and financing voyages the high finance of the time. Before there were private equity firms and hedge funds, there was cargo insurance. It was a speculative way for wealthy families and private banks to earn high returns—as long as ships arrived safely in harbor.
Today, however, the shipping industry no longer dominates the way it did in Ancient Greece and Rome or 18th century London. Most people never consider the skyscraper-sized container ships that carry clothes, grain, and other cargo from one port to another. 
Nor do most people consider the $30 billion maritime insurance industry that insures that cargo for a few cents on the dollar against the possibility of, say, a giant container of cargo falling overboard in stormy seas—a calamity that befalls an estimated 2,000 to 10,000containers (much less than 1% of all containers) each year. 
But 2,000 years ago, cargo insurance was also essential to the survival of some of the world’s first great cities. Rome’s population was the largest in the Western world until 18th century London. Athens and other Greek cities grew large on the strength of their ports rather than landholdings. Without the Ancient Romans insuring trading ships, those cities would never have received enough food each year to become large urban centers whose accomplishments we still study and admire today. 
An Alternative to the Oracle
Maritime insurance is the oldest form of insurance by centuries. But it looked very different when it was sought by sailors crossing the seas that Odysseus had found so perilous. It was much more speculative.
Instead of paying a fee to insure their cargo, merchants funded their voyages with loans that also served as insurance. The loans had very high interest rates, because under the terms of the loan, if the ship sank or the voyage did not succeed, the merchant did not have to repay the loan. This practice, which dates back to at least 1800 BCE and Ancient Babylon, is known as “bottomry”—a reference to the fact that lenders could claim the ship itself if they were not paid back on time. 
In Chances Are… Adventures in Probability, Ellen and Michael Kaplan describe bottomry as an amalgam of modern financial concepts:
It is an arrangement that is easy to describe but difficult to characterize: not a pure loan, because the lender accepts part of the risk; not a partnership, because the money to be repaid is specified; not pure insurance, because it does not specifically secure the risk to the merchant's goods. It is perhaps best considered as a futures contract: the insurer has bought an option on the venture's final value.
Still, it’s clear that merchants and lenders used bottomry and maritime loans to minimize risk and maximize profit. In Ancient Greece, lenders demanded higher interest rates during stormy seasons. They also charged higher rates to unreliable borrowers like Aischines, a merchant whose reputation led Athens’ maritime lenders to say it was “less risky to 'sail to the Adriatic' than to deal with this fellow.”
Greek lenders did not jealously guard access to the best deals. Instead it seems that Athenian lenders spread the risk by investing and insuring small amounts in many voyages. Surviving records of maritime loans all show more than one lender per vessel. 
Historians believe that Greek merchants and lenders thought of the high interest rates as compensation for taking on the risk of the voyage failing. They also note that Rome copied the practice of bottomry from the Greeks, and a legal text from 500 AD, when the Empire’s capital had moved  to Constantinople, explicitly confirms that Romans equated high interest rates with paying for risk. At the time, Roman law capped interest rates at 12%. Yet as James Franklin notes in The Science of Conjecture, the law sanctioned higher interest rates in the case of maritime loans because “the price is for the peril.”
This is why historians consider bottomry and maritime loans to be the earliest form of cargo insurance....MUCH MORE
Possibly related:
"The Lost World of the London Coffeehouse"

There is so much business that has the coffeehouses back in the mists of their early history, Lloyd's and The Jerusalem for the maritime crowd, Jonathan's and Garraway's [#14 on map] for the stockjobbers. Unfortunately the instant piece doesn't go into much detail, I may have to put a post together. For now here's Jonathan Swift on the exchange crowd:

...Meantime, secure on Garraway cliffs,
A savage race, by shipwrecks fed,
Lie waiting for the foundered skiffs,
And strips the bodies of the dead."
Harsh.
(He lost money in the South Sea bubble)


From The Public Domain Review:...

...Here are the main establishments frequented by the stockjobbers and other denizens:

“The Vertue of the COFFEE Drink”: An Ad for London’s First Cafe Printed Circa 1652
The Men Who Brew Too Much: "Old Time Farm Crime: The Coffee Spies of the 1700s"
"The Coffee Houses of Augustan London"

These Are Not Good Days For ISIS

I'm pretty sure getting killed by a pig means no 72 virgins for these guys, no white raisins either.*
From IraqiNews:

Wild boars rampage in Kirkuk, leave 3 Islamic State members dead
Wild boar (representational photo)
Kirkuk (IraqiNews.com) Three Islamic State militants died late Sunday when wild boars attacked them in southern Kirkuk, a local source was quoted saying. 
The animals went on a rampage near a farmland in al-Rashad region, an Islamic State pocket 53 kilometers south of Kirkuk. They attacked the militants and left three killed, according to the source. 
Alsumaria News quoted the source saying that “Daesh (Islamic State) militants took revenge at the pigs that attacked the farmland,” but did not clarify the method....MORE
*Virgins? What virgins?
It is widely believed that Muslim 'martyrs' enjoy rich sensual rewards on reaching paradise. A new study suggests they may be disappointed. Ibn Warraq reports...
The Times also had the story, with a more alpha looking boar:
Isis fighters killed by wild boar as they hid waiting in ambush

And From the Telegraph:
Hackers flood Isis social media accounts with gay porn

"Synchronoss Technologies stock plummets 28% on departures from CEO and CFO; revenue warning"

My first thought was "Well that doesn't sound good"
My second was "Only 28%?"

Ha! That was in late pre-market with a half-hour to the open.

Here's MarketWatch:
Synchronoss Technologies Inc. SNCR, -47.24% stock plummeted 28.1% in premarket trade Thursday on news that the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer are leaving the company to "pursue other interests" and a first-quarter revenue warning...MORE
CEO'a are a dime a dozen but when the CFO says adios it gets your attention.

"Time to Explore Alternative Ownership Structures for Network Effects Businesses including Twitter" (TWTR)

Following on the post immediately below on the hyper-Pareto accretion of revs to FB and the GOOG, an idea for the so-far loser in the platform wars.

From Continuations:
At Union Square Ventures, network effects have been central to our investment thesis for a decade. From an investor perspective network effects are one of the few, possibly the only, source of sustainable competitive advantage in a world where almost everything else can be copied quickly.

But we also early on recognized that this has the potential for setting up a deep conflict between companies that operate networks and the participants in those networks: the value to shareholders can be increased through rent extraction from the network. And with many network effects companies reaching near monopoly status the potential for harmful rent extraction has grown. Harm can come in many forms, such as directing too much attention towards commercial use or suppressing innovation.

One response to this problem of how to be a good steward of a network has been my advocacy for the Public Benefit Corporation. I participated in a session with Delaware legislators and spoke when the governor signed the PBC status bill into law. Since then our portfolio companies Kickstarter and Human Dx have both converted to PBC status. Effectively in each case they are making a commitment in their charter to be good steward of their respective networks not just for the benefit of shareholders but for the benefit of all.

But our exploration of alternative ownership structures for network effects businesses should not stop there. Much more experimentation is needed as well as an understanding of historic forms, which showed much more diversity than one would be led to believe from the current dominance of the singularly shareholder focused C Corporation.

I therefore strongly support the shareholder proposal to study alternative forms of ownership for Twitter.
Here are four examples of ownership structures that could and should be examined:

Co-operatives. These have played an important role in the creation of utilities of various kinds from grocery distribution to telephone networks. Generally the members contribute capital to build some piece of shared infrastructure.

Mutuals. Insurance is inherently a network effects business and many insurance companies started out as mutuals. These are similar to co-operatives and may have membership fees but tend not to require an initial contribution of capital....MORE
As for Zuck, Sergey and the gang, regulate them as public utilities.
Tomorrow I shall take on world peace.

Media: Problems With Revenue Flows and the Reason Ms Kaminska Wrote That FT Story

I thought she was just bored and we didn't link but now it appears the article was part of a business-side decision.

From King Lord Murph of Moz (I so hope that catches on) writing under his subsidiary title as founder/editor of FT Alphaville:

It seems Google and Facebook really are taking ALL the growth in ad revenue
It’s a big day in American digital ad land, with the publication of the Interactive Advertising Bureau’s year-end report for 2016.
You’ll find it here.

But before you delve into that, consider this tweet from Jason Kint.
Kint runs a thing called Digital Content Next, which is the key trade body for what is generally regarded as grown-up, mainstream media. They’ve even let the FT in as a member....MORE
"...But the fact is that we are going to have to revisit our content policy here on FTAV.
You’ll be glad to know we’ve made a start."

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

"What Do Germans Think of the Juicero?"

It's come to this, the Germans are making jokes, JOKES, at Silicon Valley's expense.

From The Awl:

Deutschland über us (now almost as strong as two human hands).
Despite the recently accepted honor of most important country in the world, Germany is a small place. Geographically, it is not even the size of Montana; its population (80 million very stern people) is about twice the size of California. At the same time, German speakers are very obsessed with the news: in parts of Germany and all of Austria, for example, the $7 price of a cup of coffee at a Kaffeehaus is justified because patrons can sit and nurse that coffee for ten hours while they read literally every single page of every single newspaper to which the Kaffeehaus subscribes precisely for that purpose. The result? When they run out of their own news (which they always do), Germans and Austrians keep up with news from all over the world — even when (prepare to spit out your breakfast cupcakes, Amis) that news doesn’t necessarily concern them.

And this means that even in a week when the Head Debutante of the West Wing shows up at a German women’s event and touts her daddy’s agenda (and gets reacted to extremely appropriately), there is still space in the German press for the most pressing issue in the world. (That was a pun, which is a German’s favorite method of humor, which is why Heidegger is so hilarious.) And the reason for the employment of that pun (explaining jokes is a German’s second-favorite method of humor) is that the German press still managed to weigh in on a certain American press…a juice press, that is. (GET IT? TWO USES OF THE WORD “PRESS.”)

What, pray tell, does the Teutonic media have to say about a certain $400 wifi-enabled kitchen gadget, one that squeezes juice out of pre-packaged packages of slightly thicker juice, with a unit of force that only people in Silicon Valley are meant to understand (despite it sharing a name with an actual unit of scientific measurement that measures something entirely unrelated to fruit juice) — a unit that, it turns out, is roughly equivalent to slightly less than the gripping power of two journalist hands? HAS THE JUICERO MADE THE GERMAN NEWS? HAS IT? HAS IT? HAS IT?
The answer is ja! First let’s check out jetzt (“now”), a Cool Young People’s Blog operated by the Süddeutsche Zeitung, aka the New York Times of Germany.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*ezfszFlWTwc1vM0QxG4Xjg.png
Screengrab: JETZT
This headline translates, loosely, thus: “The hipster juice press is all out of juice,” with juice having the same double meaning here that it does in English, GET IT? Why they didn’t go with the double meaning of press, which is also the same in their language and given our own media’s evisceration of the contraption, don’t know, but there you have it. Literally what it says is closer to “[With] the hipster juice press, the juice is turned off,” which, if you say it to yourself in a thick German accent, is indeed very funny. The piece itself is, as German humor tends to be when not punning, sandpaper-dry:
Anyone who quickly checks their pocket calculator to see just how much a glass of this juice costs will probably come to the conclusion that even Til Schweiger’s Hamburg tap water (at EUR 4,20 a liter) is almost a bargain. On the other hand: Normal juice presses don’t have WiFi — the end-all be-all argument of the Juicero’s adherents.
The best things about this paragraph, other than its reference to a pocket calculator and sick burns on Tils, the ill-fated bottled water venture of sexy German actor-man Til Schweiger, is lost in translation: the German word for “juicer,” Entsafter (ent-ZOFT-ur) literally means “de-juicer,” which, of course, is much more accurate; and, even better, the German expression I’ve translated to “end-all be-all” is Totschlag-Argument (TOTE-shlog-ar-goo-MENT), the first word of which literally means “death blow,” something I am betting Juicero founder Doug Evans would like to deal to the valiant hand-squeezers at Bloomberg that first broke this story.

Meanwhile, the Osnabrücker Zeitung — the functioning local newspaper out of the small Saxon town of Osnabrück — dispenses with both subtlety and puns, and wonders, simply:...MUCH MORE
All i can say in response is: Rocket Internet.
(note the subtlety symbolic use of red ink)

"The Statistics of Coin Tosses for Theater Geeks"

From JSTOR Daily:
Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads, again.

Tom Stoppard’s classic play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead opens with two Elizabethan players, some well-stocked prop moneybags, and the flip of a coin that lands as heads. Again. And again. And again.

In Stoppard’s scene, the bit actors Rosencrantz and Guildenstern kill time during a production of Shakespeare’s Hamlet by betting on coin tosses. Guildenstern flips a florin and Rosencrantz predicts that it will land as heads. It does. Guildenstern spins another coin and it lands as heads again. After Rosencrantz has successfully bet heads 77 times in a row, Guildenstern proclaims that, “A weaker man might be moved to re-examine his faith, if in nothing else at least in the law of probability.” He ends up flipping heads 92 times in a row. Forsooth, what are the odds?

The likelihood of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s scenario actually happening is 1 in 5 octillion, a probability so small that it is practically impossible to imagine. According to NOAA’s website, it is more likely that a person in the United States will be struck by lightning four times in one year than repeat the results of Guildenstern’s coin tossing. The 92 heads in a row is, however, more likely to happen than randomly shuffling a deck of cards and discovering that they appear sorted.
More interesting than sussing out precise odds, however, are the premises of the scene. What makes it so absurd? What do we “know” about the probable outcome of tossing a coin that lets us “get” Stoppard’s joke? We know that the odds of a coin toss ought to be a 50/50, split between heads and tails, so surely there must be something wrong with the universe—something unfair?—for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s scenario to play out.

The Mystique of the Biased Coin
The toss of the coin functions as cultural shorthand. A flipped coin is assumed to be an unbiased way to pick between two possible outcomes, since both parties involved in the toss have an equal chance of winning.

So long as the coin is a fair coin, that is. A fair coin is one where either side of the disk has an equal chance of turning up, according to the probabilities worked out by the seventeenth-century Swiss mathematician Jakob Bernoulli. It means that one side can’t be favored, whether it’s inadvertent (say, the manufacture of the coin adds weight to one side, favoring a flip to one side over the other) or intentional (a two-headed coin). When an unfair coin is tossed, it conveys an unfair manipulation of the world to shift the odds in someone’s favor.

In other words, Guildenstern and other flippers of coins have a profound faith that odds of a coin toss are split 50/50, between heads and tails. Part of what makes Stoppard’s scene so compelling is that it plays to the audience’s skepticism that someone could win 92 tosses in a row by betting heads. Sure, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s epic coin tossing demonstrates that such a thing is possible, we tell ourselves—it’s just not very probable.

A Short History of Coin Flips 

https://daily.jstor.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Roman_coin_2.jpg
Roman coin depicts the head of Emperor Caracalla (via Wikimedia Commons)
Tossing a coin to decide an outcome is nothing new. Since the Roman Empire and throughout the Middle Ages of Europe, a coin toss has offered a way to decide between two alternatives. Known as “heads or ships,” in reference to the images that appeared on the Roman sestertii, the coin toss was a children’s game of chance as well as a gambling game among the patrician elite. Legend has it that Julius Caesar would settle legal disputes with a coin toss.

A medieval variant called “cross and pile” was a favored game for children (and even young apprentices) during the Middle Ages. In the late thirteenth-century, King Edward II’s own exchequer records the royal losses of “cross and pile” when the king played against domestic servants.

In more recent eras, the coin became linked to probability, statistics, and mathematical modeling. In the eighteenth century, for example, famed mathematician and naturalist Georges-Louis Leclerc, count de Buffon, tossed a coin 4,040 times, which resulted in 2,048 heads, or very close to half the throws. (The relative frequency was ~.5069.) In the early twentieth century, the English mathematician Karl Pearson tossed a coin 24,000 times, with 12,012 of the throws coming up heads. (The relative frequency of Pearson’s experiment was ~.5005, even closer to the 50/50 odds we associate with a fair coin. Following such demonstrations, the coin became, in essence, the smallest random number generator available....MUCH MORE
Previously:
Think a coin toss has a 50-50 chance? Think again.
Gamblers Take Note: The Odds in a Coin Flip Aren't Quite 50/50